The Problem With Systematic Theology

Systematic theology, which aims to arrange religious truths into a comprehensive framework, appeals to logically-minded individuals but poses the risk of fostering rigid belief systems rather than fostering personal growth in faith and understanding. Shawn argues that while theologians have enriched Christian thought, their varying systems highlight the pitfalls of relying on structured doctrines that may inhibit genuine spiritual development.

Systematic theology often encourages rigid adherence to propositions as absolute truths, leading to dogmatism rather than genuine faith. To truly understand and develop a personal relationship with God, it is essential to explore diverse ways of knowing—including propositional, participatory, perspective, and procedural knowledge—rather than relying solely on inherited propositions.

Shawn emphasizes that faith should be comprehended through a holistic blend of four types of knowledge: propositional, participatory, perspectival, and procedural, rather than relying solely on systematic propositions imposed by external authorities. He advocates for a personal and experiential approach to understanding faith, encouraging individuals to engage in participation, perception, and procedures before accepting objective propositions.