God, Part 3

Shawn McCraney reconciles Mormonism and Biblical Christianity by challenging traditional Trinitarian views, emphasizing Jesus as "Light of the World," and promoting unity.
Published: March 4, 2014
← Back to HOTM Evangelicalism

Episode Description:

Shawn McCraney explores the reconciliation of Mormonism and Biblical Christianity by embracing the complexities of the Trinity, demonstrating courageous adaptability through engaging in public dialogues that challenge personal beliefs. By emphasizing Jesus's claim as "the Light of the World," he encourages believers to seek deeper understanding of the Triune nature of God, fostering unity among Christians and promoting ongoing spiritual growth.

According to Shawn, Jesus’s declaration "I am the Light of the World" was not shocking or offensive to Jews, as it was common to attribute light to the Messiah; they instead rejected the statement by doubting its truth. Shawn also discusses his differing view on the Trinity, rejecting the notion of Eternal Sonship as traditionally defined, and emphasizing God as one entity expressing Himself in various ways rather than as separate persons before the incarnation.

The teaching suggests that Shawn rejects the traditional term "persons" used in referring to the Trinity, aiming to distinguish it from anthropomorphic notions like those found in Mormonism, instead favoring the concept of God as fire. Shawn’s approach relies solely on the Bible rather than consulting external theological interpretations, leading him to challenge traditional Trinitarian doctrines such as the Eternal Sonship, and emphasizing a personal understanding shaped independently.

Understanding the pre-creation ontology of God involves recognizing Theos, Logos, and Pneuma as manifestations of one monotheistic God, best visualized as a consuming fire and light, representing spiritual purity and truth, as stated in scripture. This perspective challenges conventional interpretations of distinct personhood in God while emphasizing His attributes of light, love, and omniscience against any notions of ignorance or deception.

The teaching explores the concept that Jesus, as a consuming fire, embodies the light of the world, referencing passages from Genesis, John, and 1st John to illustrate that this light, present from the creation, became incarnate as Jesus Christ. It emphasizes God's foundational plan for victory through this light, which has been manifest since the foundation of the world and highlighted through the scriptural testimonies of Jesus’ divine nature and his role in creation’s beginning.

In Shawn's teaching, he suggests that the Hebrew word for God, "elohiym," signifies a plural unity involving Theos, the Spirit, and the Word, emphasizing that the presence of darkness ("Kho-shek") in Genesis 1:2 symbolizes evil and destruction, rather than literal darkness. He further explains that when God said, "Let there be light," it was not about creating the sun or celestial bodies, but rather an introduction of divine light, symbolically tied to Jesus as the "Light of the World," referencing the promised Messiah and the self-existing nature of the Word from the beginning.

Before creation, God established the solution to darkness by speaking "Let there be light," symbolizing Jesus as the Light of the World, triumphing over darkness and referred to as the Day Star or Morning Star. Jesus, the pre-incarnate Word, is portrayed as the source of spiritual illumination, intended to shine in the darkness of the world and within the hearts of believers, as expressed in passages like Genesis 1, 2nd Peter 1:19, and Revelation 22:16.

Shawn adeptly uses minimal true evidence to convince a broad audience of various falsehoods, though many of his callers show a lack of understanding in Mormon doctrine and history. An invitation is extended by Drew, an active Mormon with deeper knowledge, to debate with Shawn and defend the truth of their faith publicly.

Shawn was praised for his ability to persuade many with minimal evidence, though the writer, Drew, criticized his show's callers for lacking understanding of Mormon doctrine and history. Drew, an active Mormon, expressed interest in debating Shawn, feeling that those with more knowledge of church and biblical history should represent the faith.